Be very concerned when a school Superintendent uses words like “all
inclusive” to describe the central goal of his district. It means that at the next parent teacher
conference the discussion will probably focus on the quality of the muffins or
the type of band-aids used, rather than the results of a reading program. Feel badly for the children and the parents
who actually think this is good.
Contrary to Antioch USD Superintendent Donald Gill’s July 23rd
guest commentary in the Contra Costa Times about his District, schools
providing breakfast, “second chance breakfast” (rewarding tardiness won’t
create more tardiness?), lunch and dinner, snacks, health care, etc. to school
children is not positive, but is yet another deterioration of our culture and
society. It is, ultimately, bad for everyone. There is nothing
endearing about parents abdicating their responsibilities to raise their
children by turning them over to a school district for twelve hours a day. Why not just build orphanages and give
parents visiting rights?
Families have held our culture together since its founding; eating
a meal together has always been a core event of parenthood. Whether it’s
talking about the events of the day, reinforcing and encouraging good behavior,
being good role models, or dispensing discipline, it is an essential event of
the day.
In his book “Cooked” food critic and nutritionist, Michael Pollen
reflects on the importance of the family meal to our culture. “The shared meal is no small thing,” he
says. “It is a foundation of family
life, the place where our children learn the art of conversation and acquire
the habits of civilization: sharing, listening, taking turns, navigating
differences, and arguing without offending.”
In other words, sharing a meal with parents is where our children learn
the skills necessary to function successfully in a school environment and grow
into capable citizens.
Dr. Gill’s announcement also appears to be an abdication of the district’s
purpose, to provide the best possible education to kindergarten through high
school age children. It is squandering
the district personnel’s time and is recognition, to paraphrase W.C. Fields, that
“if you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull”.
The district, like many urban school districts, has racial and
discipline issues, lawsuits, morale problems, and a less than stellar
educational record. Struggling to educate
children within this chaos, Dr. Gill has adopted the strategy of failing school
systems in Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.:
distract and placate parents by providing redundant social services,
rather than exceptional educational services. Rather than facing the community straight on,
his strategy is nothing more than buying the support of a dependent and
sometimes hostile segment of the district, while growing another, larger,
generation of dysfunctional entitlement children.
The irony of the District’s decision is that it will make the job of
educating their children more difficult.
As the children feel less and less loved and valued at home their
behavior will deteriorate. Ultimately, in
the name of political correctness, Dr. Gill and the district is doing themselves
and the people of Antioch and East County communities a dis-service.
They have obviously lost their way. If their main job isn't to teach our students, then whose job is it?
ReplyDeleteSilly me. I thought the main purpose of the schools was to EDUCATE. How stupid to think this. I need to get in touch with reality. No, actually Dr. Gill needs a strong dose of reality-his job is an educator, not a social engineer.
ReplyDelete